Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sander Jong vs Mees Rottgering Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Rottgering analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Sander Jong vs Mees Rottgering Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Rottgering
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 52.76% of points on their second serve, while Rottgering has won 47.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 48.89% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rottgering has won 55.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.99% and 30.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 54.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rottgering has saved 64.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 65.33% of matches played (W/L 49/ 26), with Rottgering winning 58.33% (W/L 14/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jong has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 6/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 19/ 11). Rottgering has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Jong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.22% of matches (W/L 49/ 25), where as Rottgering has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jong winning 1 times and Rottgering being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Rottgering winning 0. The last match between Jong and Rottgering was at the M15 Eindhoven, 02-08-2023, Second, Clay with Sander Jong getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jong and Rottgering have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jong winning 0 times and Rottgering 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jong winning 0, and Rottgering 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 172.92 while Rottgering has played against players with an average rank of 65.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rottgering has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 44.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rottgering has converted 47.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
463
Rank
463
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
890
Rank
886
High
16
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
65% (75-41)
Career Total W/L
57% (17-13)
66% (23-12)
YTD W/L
55% (6-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Sander Jong vs Mees Rottgering For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jong VS Rottgering
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Jong VS Rottgering H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Sander Jong | Mees Rottgering |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (29/56) | 51% (35/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (23/29) | 54% (19/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (14/27) | 41% (14/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (36/69) | 34% (19/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jong VS Rottgering H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Sander Jong
Player
Mees Rottgering
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sander Jong | Mees Rottgering |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (23/12) | 55% (6/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (49/30) | 52% (13/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (410/347) | 51% (122/115) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.61 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 225 | 21 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:37 | 1:48:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 165.37 | 97 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1355/2153) | 60% (476/798) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (1006/1355) | 67% (319/476) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (421/798) | 48% (154/322) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (94/212) | 47% (36/76) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (882/2239) | 40% (293/734) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 66% (23/12) | 55% (6/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (23/35) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (22/21) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (22/1) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 0% (4/0) |
Sander Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Sander Jong
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Evan Palumbo
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Sander Jong
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marc Antoine Gaillard
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Adam Briant
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Pawel Juszczak
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sebastian Sorger
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
84%
(
76 of
90)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sasa Markovic
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marcel Zielinski
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mees Rottgering Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Mees Rottgering
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Unknown Player
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Mees Rottgering
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Mees Rottgering
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
19
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
57 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
10 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(7) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Mees Rottgering
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
David Perez Sanz
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Mees Rottgering
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Patrick Zahraj
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Kristjan Tamm
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Jong Vs Rottgering Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jong are available here and Rottgering photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
